In 2016, American households headed by someone aged 32-61 averaged $120,809.40 in retirement savings, or $264,453.30 using an expansive calculation. Using the same calculations and definitions, American households have a median of $7,800 and $17,000 saved, respectively.
American Retirement Savings in 2016
In 2016, the Economic Policy Institute released a study with an interesting dive into American household retirement savings. Using the strict criteria of only money in liquid retirement accounts and pensions (think IRAs, 401(k)s, and current and future pensions) they zoomed in on ages 32-61. Presumably, 32 year olds should be out of any education and started saving, while 61 year olds are too young to take Social Security.
Using 2013 Survey of Consumer Finances Data, they found these households saved a median of only $5,000 in retirement accounts. Our analysis extended the same strict definition to 2016 SCF data (released in 2017), finding the median household saved $7,800. We also extended the definition to include other reasonably liquid savings vehicles including stocks, bonds, and savings accounts and found a slightly more encouraging $17,000 median. (Full definitions are in the methodology section).
American Retirement Savings Chart for 2016
Using these definitions, between 23% and 42% of households have no liquid savings likely dedicated to retirement. Here is how the two methodologies compare for selected percentiles.
Compare Your Retirement Savings to Other Americans
How do your own retirement savings stack up with your peers? Although we don’t have this broken out by ages (yet – stay tuned), you can compare your retirement savings to other households here. For the strict definition, only use assets in retirement accounts and pensions. In the expansive definition, use assets anywhere that you plan to dedicate to your eventual retirement.
Retirement Savings Definitions and Methodology
Our data comes from the 2016 Survey of Consumer Finances, and our retirement savings methodology closely hews to the EPI definitions. For the strict definition, we also use household heads age 32-61, and use the variable RETQLIQ. (It’s easiest to pull it yourself using Berkeley’s SDA Tool). In short, it includes IRAs, Keoghs, Pensions, and Thrift-type accounts (such as your 401(k) or 403(b)).
For the expansive definition, we started from the umbrella category FIN, or all financial assets. From that we removed checking accounts and prepaid cards (presumably people use those to spend), as well as other miscellaneous assets. We also eliminated whole life insurance and trusts, which are generally estate planning tools.
Here’s how our definition lines up with the Berkeley Net Worth flow chart [pdf] (red box = not included):
While even the expansive definition doesn’t capture all styles of retirement savings (like real estate), these numbers are still worrying. A large number of households – 42% or 23% – have zero assets in the categories likely earmarked for retirement.
We’ll break these numbers down further into age groups of course, but as a first cut these are concerning. You’d have hoped to see a larger number of households with retirement savings set aside and higher total assets. In 2016 the 401(k) contribution limit was $18,000 and 57% of households in the strict set had less saved in their retirement accounts.
What did you take away from this data?